> In that case it might be better to refer to it as a "binding identifier"
> or "binding name". It's not a URL at all, since it doesn't provide
> information how to locate a binding on the network. Its not a URI either
> since it can only be interpreted in the context of a broker, so it's not
> a universal identifier.

+1. I agree it's not really an URL, so calling that is misleading. That
said, I have to wonder about the format. Why does it have a prefix at all?
After all, it appears to me the prefix is carrying redundant information:

topic://amq.topic?routingkey='stocks.#'
direct://amq.direct/SimpleQueue

Notice that the prefix and the "host" part say the same anyway.
On the other hand, I might just be showing off my ignorance here :)


Tomas Restrepo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/




Reply via email to