Carl, One approach would to add the headers and footers to the autoexport template. This way they are consistent and do not necessarily need to be put in the live wiki. Cheers, Eric
> -----Original Message----- > From: Carl Trieloff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 8:57 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Web site > > Cliff Schmidt wrote: > > On 1/9/07, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> 1. I have updated the home page to have the disclaimer > line and link > >> to status page > > > > I just took a quick look at what other podling home pages have. It > > looks to me like most of them include the Incubator logo (see > > http://incubator.apache.org/images/apache-incubator-logo.png). I > > think you should definitely add this somewhere. > > > > Some of them also include the full disclaimer text on the home page > > like http://incubator.apache.org/ode/. Some of them > include both the > > logo and the disclaimer text, like > http://incubator.apache.org/xap and > > http://incubator.apache.org/uima/. > > > Thanks, I was trying to see if I could get the incubator logo > into the navigation bar so that it shows up on every page. I > need to play with that a bit. I also wanted to try create a > footer or header that had the incubator text. > > If I can't get that working in the next few days I will break > down and just paste it onto the home home. > > > > > > >> 2. The license has been added to the project. > > > > There seems to be an emoticon from the "(i)" in the license > text. You > > could always link directly to > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0, although that > would leave > > your site. And I don't think this is necessary right now; but, as I > > mentioned before, it would be nice to eventually link to something > > that includes all the relevant licenses, as is required in the > > distribution's LICENSE file. > > > Fixed on wiki - thanks, will publish in a bit. > > > > > > >> 3. I have created the people page. I used the Geronimo template and > >> modified a bit given our > >> incubator status. Please update your origination if you > want it. I got > >> the list of names by working though > >> the achieve to see who has substantial contributed > (definition of this > >> could be debated, but I just looked for > >> consistent list & code contributions). I also provided a > section for > >> those that are contributing > >> but are not committers yet, or may chose not to become > committers. Names > >> are in alphabetical order by first > >> name - just copied format from Geronimo. An then of coarse > list our > >> mentors. > > > > I realize that you are basing this on what Geronimo has done, but > > personally, I think it's a bad idea to list the organizations on the > > project's people page. Most people seem to want to know this on the > > proposal, but I think it might send the wrong message to someone who > > doesn't know much about Apache and is browsing the project's site. > > > > It also seems to be a little tricky to me to decide which committers > > to list. Unless a committer says they are no longer active or don't > > want to be listed, I would think you should list them all. > You could > > keep a separate list of PPMC members (which were elected based on > > their history as being the active committers). > > > > Aside from getting the Incubator logo on the page (which I think > > really does need to be done), all of this is just my personal > > suggestion. > > > > > Thanks, on the last topic I was in two minds about how to do > that so I > will start a new > thread on the topic with some additional questions I have. > Glad to see > someone read my > note - I was hoping it would be discussed. > > Regards > Carl. > >
