On 18/01/07, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Greig wrote:
But the current trunk is still tracking 0-8 I think (i.e. thats the
version of the spec in use and echoed on connection handshaking).
Ah ok, in that case I think that should be changed. I certainly don't
view the trunk as tracking 0-8.
> e.g. let us assume for the purposes of this discussion that field
> table type enhancements is in AMQP 0-10. In that case I would not view
> it as a bug that trunk java does not interop with trunk C++ at a given
> point in time (although there is obviously a task there for C++ to
> implement that change).
If the c++ code is based on 0-10 (i.e. that is the spec it builds off
and announces on connection startup) and doesn't support all the types
then yes, that would in my view imply a 'known bug' in the c++ code,
preventing full use of the protocol.
Yes.
RG
