Alan Conway wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 08:35 +0000, Gordon Sim wrote:
Gordon Sim wrote:
Robert Godfrey wrote:
OK - I'll add a fix to the Python test to my patch then... I guess
that may
mean there is a bug in the C++ broker if it passes this test :-)
Yes, I'll have a look into that.
FYI: I have checked in a fix to the python test (and to the c++ broker
which was indeed failing to close the connection). I also came upon a
race in the processing of the socket close and the connection.close
method and have put in a tentative workaround for that.
Fixed on trunk? Is this a fix that I'll need to merge to 0-9 to make all
python tests pas there?
Yes, its a fix on trunk (both c++ and python). We will want to merge it
on to 0-9, but my changes shouldn't break anything on the 0-9 branch.