Thanks :-)

Marnie


On 1/18/07, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 09:35 +0000, Marnie McCormack wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Just to be clear - you're talking about the branch here, rather than
trunk ?

Yes, I'll put [c++ 0-9 branch] in the subject in future to make that
clear. Rest assured I would never do a commit that put the trunk in a
state like the 0-9 branch is in now (at least not on purpose...;)

It'll all be better soon...

>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Marnie
>
>
> On 1/17/07, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The Qpid C++ code is in flux, I did some restructuring yesterday and
> > will do some more today. If you're working on anything and need help
> > merging give me a shout.
> >
> > Yesterday I renamed the broker-side Session classes (excluding
> > SessionContext, will rename today) to use the more AMQP-standard name
> > "Connection" and separated the "adapter" layer of the broker from the
> > Connection core class.
> >
> > Today I will move most of the Connection logic to the Channel classes
> > (client & broker) since most processing happens on a channel and in
> > particular request/response ID handling has to happen in the context
of
> > a channel. Stuff for channel 0 will be handled by Channe(0) since this
> > too must have proper request-response ID handling.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alan.
> >
> >


Reply via email to