[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Robert Greig resolved QPID-312.
-------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: M2

Patch applied svn revision 501006

> Inconsistency in naming conventions
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-312
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-312
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Dot Net Client
>    Affects Versions: M2
>            Reporter: Tomas Restrepo
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: M2
>
>         Attachments: QPID-312.diff
>
>
> There is some inconsistency at this time naming conventions that would be 
> good to resolve:
> 1- Some interfaces still have their original java-like name without the I 
> prefix, which is the usual .NET convention. Examples: ByteBufferAllocator, 
> BrokerInfo, ConnectionInfo
> 2- Some classes that use the Amq prefix while others most use AMQ (like 
> AmqBrokerInfo and AmqChannel). The latter is the recommended convention by 
> FxCop, but it doesn't matter much as long as we're consistent.
> 3- A lot of classes ported from Java still have methods named using the 
> original java convention (camelCase).
> 4- Some namespaces are stil in camelCase (example Qpid.Client.qms)
> At least for 2 we should decide what the convention will be so that code can 
> be adapted and be consistent in this regard.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to