Tomas, The license looks like a BSD license to me (http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php)
Which is an acceptable license http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html -- Martin On 31/01/07, Tomas Restrepo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rupert, > I think we are going to need to continue to support 1.1, as there are > existing projects using it. That's fine, that's why I suggested an alternative library to support SSL on v1.1, but someone should definitely check if there would be any licensing issues there. What do you think about the rest of the proposal? Any comments? Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/
