On 08/02/07, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just thought that an empty string is a little confusing in terms of a 'name' for a virtual host. Would be nicer imho to mark a defined vh as default in the config.xml and use that where no vh specified on the connection url ?
I think that is the best approach, and it fits with the web server analogy (for what that's worth). RG
