On 2/27/07, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The actual components involved in a given test run should be determined at runtime by the controller, not baked into the tests.
Just to clear. I'm in agreement with you here. What I'm saying is that coordinator works out what is available to test but dynamically names the results to reflect what was actually tested. The use of the JUnit XML output format is for the convenience of that fact that most automated build servers understand that format and can produce reports from it. It may prove to be convenient to use JUnit to write the coordinator, but not necessary in order generate results with a matching format to that used by JUnit.
