Robert Godfrey wrote:
Having said that, because of requirements put forward by people actually using the software, we have built a higher level of interoperability at the JMS level into the .net and C++ clients, and C++ broker (i.e. extending the FieldTable to cope with the new types).
The c++ trunk only (as far as I know) includes an update to cope with the 'binary' field table value type. It doesn't (as far as I know) cope with any of the other extended types.
