The java broker doesn't correctly count the message references so occasionally we are seeing errors in the tests. I also have to commit my topic matching exchange which seems stuck at 90% done.
On 07/03/07, Robert Godfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone who has oustanding work on the trunk pipe up now... I am working on a refactoring for post the M2 cut to support multiple versions of the protocol in the Java Broker, so personally I'm in favour of an early M2 cut... however I still have concerns about making an M2 branch before we've actually concluded the vote on an M2 release :-) -- Rob On 07/03/07, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Martin Ritchie wrote: > > The suggestion wasn't to hold up development for M2 but rather to hold > > up M2 release until development has ticked all the boxes we have set > > ourselves for M2 release. I understand the desire to get 0.9 on the > > trunk and think that should be our main driver just now but we do need > > to do a release and that release needs to contain a very stable > > release as we will not be doing another release for sometime, if > > previous discussions are anything to go by. > > > It sounds like we're in agreement that we should start the M2 branch > soon so 0.9 work can proceed. I'd like to create the branch early to > merge C++ - that doesn't prevent Java from holding off on the 0-9 merge > to finish up stuff aimed at both M2 and trunk before diverging the two > with the 0-9 merge. > > Cheers, > Alan. >
-- Martin Ritchie
