I'm all for Ruby, and python for that matter, but the remaining gap afaik is user docs on the wiki.
Anyone feel inclined to add some ? Would contribute but haven't got as far as these clients yet :-( Bfn, Marnie On 3/7/07, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for ruby from me also. Robert Godfrey wrote: > +1 for Ruby in M2 from me then > > On 07/03/07, Rafael Schloming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I spent some time yesterday bringing the ruby implementation in sync >> with the Java broker and adding some tests. I also added a test harness >> with a simple run-tests script similar to the python script of the same >> name. With these changes the ruby impl now has easily runnable test >> coverage for connection negotiation, channel open/close, publishing, and >> consuming basic messages. >> >> Given this I believe it would be perfectly appropriate to include it in >> a release perhaps with a disclaimer stating that it is newer and less >> used than the other clients. >> >> --Rafael >> >
