On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 17:30 +0000, Rupert Smith wrote: > It may only be my ignorance, but Java is easiest for me...
I'd agree with Alan; Python or Ruby seem to me to be simpler to work with than Java for scripting type tasks which is what the co-ordinator really is. One thing worth noting is that Java is much less common on Linux than either Python or Ruby, as the licensing made it hard to ship the Sun implementation. Whereas there are very good implementations of both Python and Ruby for Windows. > > On 3/13/07, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Rupert Smith wrote: > > > Skeleton of the interop test is checked in under > > > qpid/java/integrationtests > > > for a Java coordinator and test client. > > Wouldn't it be better to write the co-ordinator in python or ruby? Since > > it's language-neutral it seems it should be in the easiest language to > > write/maintain. > > > *Only the test client needs to be ported to every other language*. > > I'll look at this in C++ as soon as I can but I've got some other stuff > > on my plate if anyone else fancies taking it. > > > >
