Alan Conway-2 wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 08:36 +0100, Martin Ritchie wrote: > Unfortunately the packaging in pantheios is truly apalling. Over 50 > static libs with names like "pantheios.1.bel.null.gcc40.debug.a" Ack. > They only have vc .dsps for their perf test and I gave up trying to > figure out what combination of libs was required for it to work. > > >
To be able to keep compatability with a large number of compilers and front end/back end options is hard - unfortunately that makes it look onerous ... thats why if you follow this link .. http://pantheios.sourceforge.net/tutorials_library_selector.html to the library selector tool you'll see Matthew's taken the hard work out of it - using the tool you select what compiler, front end and back end(s) and it generates the necessary includes. Now, is that hard ? I'd submit that for a whole lot of flexibility in options, this is a minor price - and once you are more familiar with the front ends and back-ends, selecting them manually wont be an issue Garth -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/C%2B%2B-logging---anyone-heard-of-pantheios--tf3683994.html#a10349663 Sent from the Qpid Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
