Interop tests available on Java and C++, a .Net port is in the pipeline but
not started yet.

On 24/05/07, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I guess the more 'how long is a piece of string' like question is around
interop ? (Sorry) I'm a bit detached from progress that Rupert's been
making
on that front ?

Also, there's the python and ruby clients. On account of the votes (and my
ignorance of the binding process with components in votes for releases) we
are currently compelled to include them. I guess that means they need to
work well with both brokers, or we vote to reduce the scope of the
release,
as well as be doc'd enough for users ?

Bfn,
Regards,
Marnie


On 5/24/07, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been trying to tidy up the Java side also. With some recent
> functional additions but mainly it has been fixing the odd bug. There
> are a couple of additions that should be JIRAed that would be good to
> go in with M2 such as the Mina upgrade(QPID-92) along with limiting
> the size of our send/receive buffers so we reduce the OOM issues with
> mina, and QPID-465 for JMS compliance.
>
> We also have a bug in the client where FailoverExceptions can 'escape'
> as not all client api calls correctly handle failover,QPID-402.
>
> The other serious issue is an un-JIRAed item about our implementation
> of AMQMessage on the server side. When used in Pub Sub or delivered to
> multiple queues then looks like we have a problem.
>
> Fixing those along with my current work load will probably take us to
mid
> June.
>
> On 23/05/07, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> > > Alan can u comment on the c++ side. If  I am not mistaken Alan havwe
> > > already
> > > identified JIRA's for M2 and is in the process of fixing them.
> >
> > Alan is on holiday this week. However we have a fix to the apr_pool
> > related concurrency issue, channel.flow is implemented and the interop
> > tests are written. That more or less covers the open JIRAs I think...
a
> > couple of them are still marked open as I haven't merged back to trunk
> > yet (due to other stuff I've got on the go on trunk!).
> >
>
>
> --
> Martin Ritchie
>

Reply via email to