Robert Greig wrote:
On 11/06/07, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Even the ActiveMQ guys cannot agree. As a potential Qpid implementation
of NMS would be hosted by their project they should decide whether this
is useful to have one and also take responsibility for potential legal
aspects.
OK but this impacts us in the sense that we would be doing the
implementation?
Surely we should not be putting effort into something where the legal
position is not clear? What are we supposed to say to our users? "Use
this but we can't decide whether it's violating a licence agreement"?
RG
I have not read through all the threads on the topic, but if there is
legal doubt about it
, it would make sense to explore all other alternatives first.
Carl.
