Robert Godfrey wrote:
Since 0-10 ius not a published spec (yet!) I'm not sure if we are supposed to be coding against it. My understanding is that we should only be working against published specifications...
My understanding was that anything that is publicly available (e.g. the dtx proposal) was valid as an 'input' into any qpid work.
A slightly separate issue is the version of the protocol we claim to support for any particular codebase. Supporting an unpublished and incomplete version on trunk might well be a little premature!
On the other side, we have no interoperability between c++ and java on trunk, so from a c++ perspective the earlier we can move to 0-10 the better. In that light I have implemented a few 'extensions' to the c++ side in anticipation some of the 0-10 functionality (e.g. dtx). None of these break 0-9 WIP compatability (though I have wondered how big a deal that really is given the lack of any other implementations supporting 0-9 WIP).
