On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 10:48 +0100, Rupert Smith wrote: > Martin just pointed out that the package org.apache.qpid.jms contains all of > our extensions to JMS, to support immediate/mandatory/failover etc. All > defined as interfaces. So if a 0.10 java client implements those interfaces, > existing code should be able to be ported across, without being changed. > > Rupert
This should not be an issue to implement those interfaces. The only thing is that I was thinking about delegating fail over capabilities to the Qpid API i.e. not to expose that to the JMS layer. Would it be an issue? Arnaud
