On 31/07/07, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't agree as this interface should be used for exposing specific > AMQP features.
I'm not sure what you mean? > The real debate is whether we wrap the AMQP classes > around a higher level API. I personally think that we should as there is > no notion of AMQP API and we should not introduce one. Why not? I thought the result of the long discussion we had on the subject previously on this list was that some people may want to program at the protocol level for certain "advanced" use cases? > So, we are > thinking about defining a QPID QPI that may eventually impact upon the > JMS one. I thought we already did that discussion to death? RG
