On 16/08/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rupert, > > first of all thank you for talking the time to go through and comment. > Let me try answering the first 4 questions. > > On 8/16/07, Rupert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, I have tried putting a case forward for three things. > > > > 1. Methods as classes, rather than exposed arguments. > > > [RA] On a general note, as an API user I like to use arguments rather than > classes. > I think that's what a majority of users would prefer as it looks more > natural. YMMV >
Yes, but two points: Most users will use JMS, not the low-level API. The low-level is to implement JMS on top of, and to provide extra capabilities in some scenarioes. Can provide the exposed argument forms as convenience methods on top of the method-as-class/factory style.
