Dentoing both subchannel and layer in the XML will be done... we've started talking about this issue now in the AMQP 0-10 group... hopefully the xml will soon be updated with this information.
-- Rob On 22/08/07, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 14:44 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote: > > > Is it the case that every method belongs to one of these layers? > > > > > > I would expect so. > > Yes. The layering is described in the spec text and in various JIRAs. > > > > In which case, will the layer numbers be put into the 0-10 xml? > > > > > > > No idea, or a least I don't know of any vote to do so. However the > > channels in 0-10 should be enough > > to derive this, so I don't think we need it in the XML. > > The "subchannel" id provides this kind of association. Noting it in the > XML has been discussed but I'm not sure if/when it will actually happen. > Logically it belongs in the XML as its part of the definition of a > method. > > > >
