On 04/09/07, Robert Godfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Yep - we should add some basic Access support (i've done this before - it
> seems to have got removed somewhere along the line).  The biggest issue is
> how to do this in a way that is "JMS" friendly - the only way I can see is
> to add a realm to the connection URL somehow, and let the library ask for
> that realm (and get the ticket) before anything else.

I think we could have a default realm specifiable when creating the
ConnectionFactory. So if you use the default factory.createSession()
methods you get that realm, and we can have an "extended JMS" version
that takes a realm.

Adding the realm name to the URL would also be required as you say.

> Completely agree.  I would go one stage further and say we ought to try to
> maintain compatability with M2 as well - i.e. have a modicum of
> multi-version support.  Certainly for organisations with large installed
> bases of Qpid use, this would make the upgrade path easier.

OK I think that is reasonable. It will require some more work so I
will raise a jira right now.

As soon as the vote is complete on M2 we should create an M2.1 branch.

Rajith, how are we looking for the M2 vote?

RG

Reply via email to