On 19/09/2007, Rafael Schloming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, my question really is, given that AMQShortString already > implements CharSequence, why do we need to use AMQShortString all over > the code rather than the CharSequence interface?
I'm not sure. I'm inclined to say we could use CharSequence but I don't recall whether there is a dependency (either now or planned) on extra methods not in CharSequence. Rob can probably give a better answer than I on this point. RG
