On 25/09/2007, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:26 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote: > > Suggestion: > > --------------- > > One thing that might help is if we pick a day of the week and everyone > > on the project posts what they are > > going to do that week, or at the end of the week post everything that > > they have done. That way it is easy > > for everyone on the project to be able to ask about any work being done. > > > > Thoughts..... would everyone support such a process? > > Carl. > > I'm in favour!
+1 from me too... On Qpid my main plan is to try to get back to putting 0-9 support into M2.1... Also, after issues we've been having today, butting re-fragmentation of messages where the max-frame-size is not 64Kb into the Java broker. My plan this week: > > Finish C++ session support: suspend, resume and session level acks in C > ++ client & broker. Possibly some refactoring of client handler chains > to be more consistent with broker to allow re-use of a common session > ack handler. > > Start on Queue proxies & queue replication for C++ broker. Alan - is there a design doc somewhere about how you are approaching replication / clustering in the C++ broker? Thanks, Rob
