Andrew,
I'm beginning to use field tables for my management work and I've found
that the FieldTable interface (C++ broker) only has direct support for a
couple of types (Integer, String, Timestamp, Table). Do you have any
plans to expand this set? The above types are very generic whereas the
types in the AMQP spec are very specific in terms of size and
signedness. What's the plan for supporting the larger set of available
types in field tables? I assume there's a
consistent-naming-in-client-APIs issue here.
If I use the more generic interface (i.e. FixedWidthVariable template),
I will need to embed AMQP type codes into my code which doesn't seem
like a good idea from a maintainability standpoint.
-Ted
- Plans for qpid::framing::FieldTable Ted Ross
-