Andrew,

I'm beginning to use field tables for my management work and I've found that the FieldTable interface (C++ broker) only has direct support for a couple of types (Integer, String, Timestamp, Table). Do you have any plans to expand this set? The above types are very generic whereas the types in the AMQP spec are very specific in terms of size and signedness. What's the plan for supporting the larger set of available types in field tables? I assume there's a consistent-naming-in-client-APIs issue here.

If I use the more generic interface (i.e. FixedWidthVariable template), I will need to embed AMQP type codes into my code which doesn't seem like a good idea from a maintainability standpoint.

-Ted

Reply via email to