Copied Matthieu from builder onto the thread. Matthieu, it looks like we
might
look into builder -- any support in answering questions is appreciated while
we work out if it is the way to go
Carl.
Robert Greig wrote:
On 23/11/2007, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am fine moving back to ant... consuming maven is a nightmare. every
time you
turn around there is a new set of dependencies. The builder guys at
apachecon
also have an alternative and would help us convert it we wanted to go
that way.
I have not tried buildr yet but I did speak to a colleague who is a
Ruby developer and he says that Rake (upon which Buildr is based) is
very good - flexible and straightforward to use. I think the key
requirement is flexibility.
So I would certainly support closer examination of it, and if it turns
out that it is too immature or otherwise unsuitable we did have an
excellent ant-based system that served us well in the past, courtesy
of Rafi.
RG
