On Dec 7, 2007 10:16 AM, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Rob/Arnaud's agendas look good. I'm keen to discuss testing too as I think > it crops up a lot. > > I think a short slot, time bound, on release scoping/process would be > helpful too. Not technically challenging, but imho would benefit from a > little discussion to make our releases a little more compact and speedy. > > I put together a massively borrowed set of release processes for Qpid but > i > think it could do with some work. > > As a write this I'm thinking that the 0.10 conversation alone could take > up > all four days though :-) >
I think a brief 1 hour overview of the 0-10 protocol is a good idea. This will help the devlopment process a lot. We all need to understand the protocol before we do anything. However we should not use this time to question the merits/demirts of the 0-10 protocol. (this is not the proper forum to do it). Or else we will be discussing/debating till the cows come home. I suggest Robert or Rafi to do this. Regards, Rajith > Perhaps the release process stuff can be done on the lists instead ... > > Regards, > Marnie > > On 12/7/07, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 10:39 +0000, Robert Godfrey wrote: > > > I'm just awaiting confirmation of the details from the people in > > > Glasgow who booked the location, I'll send out the details > > > individually to all those who are confirmed as coming as soon as I get > > > them. > > > > > > The main outcome from the meeting that I would like to see is a plan > > > for the beginning of 2008 which we can report back to the group. > > > > > > the things in my mind that we need to talk about are: > > > > > > * AMQP 0-10, the work already done on the Qpid client and how we move > > > the broker forward > > > * Broker refactoring : Queue, Subscription, CSDM etc > > > * Clustering / Failover in the broker and the client > > > * Configuration and Management (JMX, AMQP based mgmt) > > > * Persistence : need an Apache license compatible store > > > * Documentation, testing, examples > > > * Building, packaging, website > > > > It looks as if we have a common list -) > > > > > I suggest we use the first hour of the F2F do agree on the time we > > > wish to allocate to any topics that people bring to the table. > > > > Sounds good! > > I wanted to start thinking about an agenda earlier rather than later so > > that people can start thinking about > > solutions/designs/problems/presentations/... > > > > It would for example be excellent if an 0.10 specialist can give an > > overview of the new protocol to the group. Somebody that has worked on > > the 0.10 client can also tell people about it, etc. > > > > Arnaud > > > > > -- Regards, Rajith Attapattu Red Hat blog: http://rajith.2rlabs.com/
