On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 17:50 -0500, Alan Conway wrote: > ... > Agreed. I suspect the final set of implementations we might end up with will > be > - linux (epoll) > - posix (poll) > - windows (whatever) > > We should rename posix to linux to remove confusion. Andrew, I think you're > the > only one working under the posix dir, can you do the rename whenever it suits > you?
Actually the current source tree naming is correct - everything in the Posix directory is posix - the EpollPoller is in a different directory so renaming is unnecessary. When we have a poll() based impl it'll go in the Posix directory. A
