2008/4/9 Rafael Schloming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The test mentioned in the subject seems to test for behavior that is not JMS
> compliant. Specifically it consumes from a queue with two messages, receives
> one message, closes the consumer, consumes from the same queue again and
> expects both messages to be there. Essentially it is testing that closing
> the consumer will push the messages back onto the queue. This seems to
> directly contradict the semantics described here:
>
>  http://java.sun.com/products/jms/faq.html#msg_ack_close
>

I agree with your reading of the JMS spec - the current behaviour
seems to be incorrect.

-- Rob

Reply via email to