Tomas Restrepo wrote:
Hi Marnie,
I don't know of any samples though thinking about it I believe it was the
.NET guys that did some work on this stuff.
Anyone know better/more ?
I did most of the authentication support on the .NET client,
implementing the core SASL support. Currently the .NET client itself
should support Anonymous, CRAM-MD5, Digest, Plain and External (useful
if eventually implicit SSL with client-side certificates are supported
by the spec).
From what I remember, though, the Java client only supported Plain and
CRAM-MD5 (and one of them had an issue which I do not know if it was
fixed or not).
To complete the picture,
The M3 C++ broker also now has full SASL support. If you look at the
patches Matthew
submitted -- I think Gordon might still be working some final updates
for 0-10 final though -
sure he will comment when he sees the thread.
Carl.
