Hi again, The INSTALL file does account for this requirement. So I believe it is not required to mention it again. Modifications to configure is also better. I will look into that.
Regards, Senaka On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Both should be better. I can work on the README. > > Regards, > Senaka > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Carl Trieloff wrote: > > > > > Senaka Fernando wrote: > > > > > > > Hi again, > > > > > > > > Now I realized the problem. For the cpp build to generate the > > > > source, it is > > > > required to have 'specs'. So, taking a checkout from [1], instead of > > > > [2] > > > > should help. Also, if you already have a checkout from [1] and the > > > > issue > > > > exists, it should have got something to do with an improper > > > > checkout. > > > > > > > > [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/qpid/trunk/qpid > > > > [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Senaka > > > > > > > > > To build at all you need to svn co cpp specs, to run the full broker > > test suite you also need svn co python. > > > > Clearly this is not well enough indicated - can you suggest what would > > have saved you from this confusion - e.g. clearer README or better messages > > from ./configure. If you can suggest some text I'll update. > > > > Cheers, > > Alan. > > > >
