Manuel Teira wrote:
Looking at the libqpidbroker.so, this is what I've found, regarding those two symbols:

For
qpid::broker::Exchange::Binding::Binding(
 const std::string &,
 const boost::shared_ptr<qpid::broker::Queue>,
 qpid::broker::Exchange*,
 qpid::framing::FieldTable)

[Index]   Value          Size        Type  Bind  Other Shndx   Name
[10720] | 1581512| 2436|FUNC |GLOB |0 |10 |qpid::broker::Exchange::Binding::Binding #Nvariant 1(const std::string &,const boost::shared_ptr<qpid::broker::Queue>,qpid::broker::Exchange*,qpid::framing::FieldTable) [7746] | 0| 0|FUNC |GLOB |0 |UNDEF |qpid::broker::Exchange::Binding::Binding(const std::string &,const boost::shared_ptr<qpid::broker::Queue>,qpid::broker::Exchange*,qpid::framing::FieldTable) [12028] | 1581512| 2436|FUNC |GLOB |0 |10 |qpid::broker::Exchange::Binding::Binding(const std::string &,boost::shared_ptr<qpid::broker::Queue>,qpid::broker::Exchange*,qpid::framing::FieldTable)

For
std::pair<boost::shared_ptr<qpid::broker::Queue>,
         bool>
 qpid::broker::QueueRegistry::declare(
   const std::string &,
   bool,
   bool,
   const qpid::broker::OwnershipToken*const)

[9297] | 0| 0|FUNC |GLOB |0 |UNDEF |std::pair<boost::shared_ptr<qpid::broker::Queue>,bool>qpid::broker::QueueRegistry::declare(const std::string &,bool,bool,const qpid::broker::OwnershipToken*const) [8975] | 2223216| 1688|FUNC |GLOB |0 |10 |std::pair<boost::shared_ptr<qpid::broker::Queue>,bool>qpid::broker::QueueRegistry::declare(const std::string &,bool,bool,const qpid::broker::OwnershipToken*)


For the first one, thereis a weird (Nvariant#1?) symbol for the const boost::shared_ptr<qpid::broker::Queue> second argument, but also an undefined one, without that Nvariant. What could be causing this?

For the second one, the symbol for non-const pointer qpid::broker::OwnershipToken is defined, but not for the const pointer.

Any idea about what could be causing this?

It looks like the declaration of those methods did not match the definitions w.r.t const declarations. I checked in a change to both as r661323 - does that fix it?

Reply via email to