Hi Aidan, Just been having a quick look.
Has there been a discussion about how we restructure from the Java/C++ pov at all (apologies if I've missed it) ? So, currently there are n paths through the docs, one per implementation (more or less). Are we going to keep this distinction - i think it's useful.If not, then I guesswe need to rename our docs once exported to make their applicability clearer. I'd also propose (and I'll try to make Thursday's call) that we review the docs we have before we get too much further. Thoughts ? Bfn, Marnie On 6/11/08, Aidan Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Jonathan Robie > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think getting some of the new materials up is a high priority - Senaka > has > > written some really useful documentation, and I think the tutorials Red > Hat > > donated are also useful. Can the work be distributed somehow so more than > > one person can work on the site, and we can divide up responsibilities > and > > work in parallel? > > Yeah, the first step is probably to re-export from confluence and add > in the new material to the navigation in > src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml > > > Does Forrest allow the same level of access as the Wiki? How will people > > make changes? What features are there for reviewing changes? Could we > use > > part of the meeting on Monday to discuss how we get what materials up? > > It's easier to get an account to edit, since you only need > comittership (not comittership+confluence bit). Changes are checked > into svn, and could be reviewed as part of the code review process > (ie. qpid-commits and the meetings). > > > What timing would you suggest for having this up and running publicly? > > ASAP, although I'm currently very limited in what time I can devote to > this. I'd like to aim for end of the month, but I don't know how > realistic that is given my other comittments atm. > > - Aidan > -- > aim/y!:aidans42 g:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://aidan.skinner.me.uk/ > "We belong to nobody and nobody belongs to us. We don't even belong to > each other." >
