Robert Greig wrote:
I don't think the low level API should go in the tutorial. The low
level API is designed for the 1% of users who think they cannot
achieve what they want with the extended JMS API. It should be
documented, but we need to make clear to new users that for Java, the
JMS API is the way to go.
Doesn't that depend to some extent on what they are doing?
I write Qpid programs in several languages, and I think fairly directly
in terms of the AMQP model. If I have to use a different model, the JMS
model, to program, I always have to think that much harder. Why the
"thou shalt not" attitude toward programming Java programs directly in
the AMQP model? I would think we would want to support both. Especially
since we ship both, why not let users decide?
Jonathan
