2008/7/3 Rafael Schloming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hey Qpid-dev, > > As you may know my employer recently released MRG 1.0 based on Qpid. I'm > sure I speak for everyone at Red Hat when I say many thanks to all the > contributors who have put in so much hard work on Qpid. >
I add my congratualtions to those from Robert :-) > The packages we've released are built from the following revisions of trunk: > > qpid/specs: 666398 > qpid/python: 668378 > qpid/gentools: 668333 > qpid/java: 668333 > qpid/cpp: 667603 > > RPMs for these revisions should be available through fedora as well. > > I think it might be useful to create a branch against these revisions in > Apache SVN, since they do represent a fairly stable cross section of trunk, > and at some point if we have people who picked up qpid through fedora asking > questions, it might be handy to be able to easily reference the code they > are running. I'm happy with a tag or a branch - whatever you think is appropriate... I guess the choice depends on whether you are planning to backport patches and the like from maintenance releases that you create downstream. In future I think it would be good if you can tie your commercial releases to Apache releases... > I didn't want to just go ahead and do this though without checking if such a > branch is appropriate and/or welcomed by the community. So if you have > strong opinions on this, please let me know. > -- Rob >
