On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 13:50 +0100, Aidan Skinner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can you remind me the process that was agreed around branching? > > What I recall us settling us on was "don't, not unless there's a > (customer money) gun to your head and it can't possibly wait until the > next release".
What I recall us saying is "don't until you really need one". We need one if there is any post-M3 work going on during the freeze. I'm working on clustering code that is well decoupled but still poses a risk of me breaking the C++ broker. There may be others working on post-M3 work as well. I'd suggest we create an M3 branch and allow post-M3 work on trunk, merging M3 to trunk as we go. The alternative is to use trunk for M3 and create a post-M3-branch but that seems backwards to me. Cheers, Alan.
