Well - we've had a discussion previously where my opinion was that having things cut primarily by language was silly, and that broker/client was a bigger distinction... however since we primarily cut by language first, and presuming this work depends on the Java common stuff then i would suggest that to fit with the existing structure it should go in Java... however I am very open to discussing a different structure for the project a a whole ;-)
-- rob 2008/9/30 Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I might not want to say do this but here it comes..... > > do we not want to create a qmf directory under qpid, and the repeat the > java, cpp, python etc dir structure > under that for all the qmf bridges, tools and consoles etc. > > Carl. > > > Robert Godfrey wrote: >> >> I agree with Rafi - this should be separated from the client into a >> separate top-level module of the java codebase >> >> -- Rob >> >> 2008/9/30 Rafael Schloming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> >>> Why was this stuff added to the client module? Isn't it a stand-alone >>> app? >>> >>> --Rafael >>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Author: arnaudsimon >>>> Date: Mon Sep 29 05:02:54 2008 >>>> New Revision: 700077 >>>> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=700077&view=rev >>>> Log: >>>> qpid-1284: Qman on behalf Andrea >>>> >>>> >> >> *snip* >> > >
