Hi Arnaud, I think you'd need to split off to a separate vote thread with your proposal to get it a) noticed and b) correct in process terms ;-)
Bfn, Marnie On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- "Andrea Gazzarini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, excuse me for the intromission but after had a look at all > > the > > emails of this thread I didn't understand what is the final decision : > > where > > QMan source will be located? > > That's right nothing has been decided but that Qman should not be in client > so to simplify the distribution. I would like to suggest that we move Qman > in java/management/. > Now, I believe it would make sense to create client; broker and common > under java/management/. > Qman would be hosted under java/management/client and > java/management/common. Common would host the common part of the protocol > that could be reused when we implement the java broker agent and > java/management/client would contain the JMX part. > > So Qman code would be under: > java\management\client\src\main\java\org\apache\qpid\management\client > and > java\management\common\src\main\java\org\apache\qpid\management\ > > > When we'll provide any additional tool like a command line or WSM imp we'll > put those tools under java/tools. > > I would like people to vote on that proposal so we can quickly make the > appropriate move. > > Thanks > > Arnaud >
