[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marnie McCormack updated QPID-144:
----------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: M4)

Descoping items not being worked on for M4 into Unknown Fix Version for now

> Potential deadlocks during failover
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-144
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-144
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Dot Net Client, Java Client
>            Reporter: Steven Shaw
>            Assignee: Rob Godfrey
>
> There's a certain need for "failover safety" in the implemenation of public 
> client api methods. Any method that blocks for a response frame should be 
> wrapped in a FailoverSupport. FailoverSupport automates the retrying after 
> catching a FailoverException (a RuntimeException).
> Methods that block waiting for a response frame are now easier to identify 
> because they all call AMQProtocolHandler.syncWrite() (SyncWrite in the .NET 
> client)
> Currently the only methods employing FailoverSupport are 
> AMQConnection.createSession, AMQSession.createConsumerImpl and 
> createProducerImpl.
> AMQConnection.createSession has 3 calls to syncWrite so certainly needs to be 
> wrapped in FailoverSupport. No problem there.
> AMQSession.createConsumerImpl/createProducerImpl neither call syncWrite. 
> Unless there is some other important way in which they block, they don't 
> really need to be wrapped in the FailoverSupport. It does no harm however.
> The following methods use syncWrite() but are not wrapped in a 
> FailoverSupport:
>   AMQSession's commit(), rollback(), close()
>   AMQConnection.close() via AMQProtocolHandler.closeConnection()
>   BasicMessageConsumer.close()
> These need to be protected/wrapped in a FailoverSupport. Note that commit() 
> and rollback() are not currently protected by a lock on failoverMutex either.
> Perhaps StateManager.attainState is the only other method that blocks for "a 
> response frame". In this case a series of response frames that result in the 
> state changing. The only use of attainState is in 
> AMQConnection.makeBrokerConnection. It would appear to need to be wrapped in 
> a FailoverSupport as otherwise the FailoverException will escape. Since this 
> is failing-over during connection some care may be required. Note that the 
> makeBrokerConnection is used at 3 different sites.
> In addition sendAcknowledgement appear to need to lock the failoverMutex.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to