Hi again in regards to
>Can you expand on this? What are your throughput and latency >requirements and how many clients do you need to support? Are your >requirements for the Java clients the same as those for the C++ >clients? I want to to create a configuration of hundreds to thousands of "consumers" and "producers" most will be c++ clients some will be jms clients and in the future when the .net will support trunk i will use it as well (that the dream at least) i dont wont to losse even one message meanning i dont want to create a situation where more data is beaing pushed in than is beaing pulled out (there might fluxes but over a long time the equilirium will survie - that the plan) in order toachive that i have to understand the "limitations" of a broker (the c++ broker specifficly) i intened to use multiple computers of course and i need to understand whats the coerct ratio betwen Brokker to clients while trying to build such a configuration i ofcourse want to achieve a hi ratio at least the 300K promissed although i saw papers talking about "planned" performence of 500K and 1M per seconds i am curently un able to acheive this even with a semi - empty message ( amessage containing several characters numbering the message) i hope this explains better the scenario i am trying to create any thoughts and/or explanations about twiking the box which is running the broker for better performence will be apreciated Regards Mark On 5/17/08, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/5/17 mark yoffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > i am currentlly trying to build a setup > > using the qpidd/or rhmd c++ borker and > > the c++ client , i intened to use the java/jms(i think jms) client as > well > > > > if i understand corectlly by your explanations there is no real reason to > go > > back to M2.1 > > instead of using trunk > > For the java broker and client, the M2.1 codebase has undergone > significantly more testing. However if you need to use C++ then you > really need to stick to trunk. > > > i would like to achieve hi performence for mesage passing > > Can you expand on this? What are your throughput and latency > requirements and how many clients do you need to support? Are your > requirements for the Java clients the same as those for the C++ > clients? > > RG >
