-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 09:34 -0600 9/18/2000, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
>Yes of coures, but this does not change the fact that this is the
>fundamentally wrong way of doing things. It also does not change the fact
>that in order for the mail to be trasnferred, it will have to grow in
>size due to ASCII requirements as mentioned.
Absolutely true on all counts (although the first point is an opinion that
I just happen to share :):)).
However, the original question wasn't about the philosophy of attachments,
merely timeouts.
Just because I happen to hate attachments and styled text and HTML in
email doesn't mean that my users are going to stop using those things...
:)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0
Comment: <http://charlotte.at.northwestern.edu/julian/pgppubkey.html>
iQA/AwUBOcY3OQ5UB5zJHgFjEQK0swCdHPyhvNUB818b+66js6bZgCnO3b4AmwZ2
BhtaoR1ZQHzjNiosal4uqDFY
=PTID
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Julian Y. Koh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key:<http://charlotte.at.northwestern.edu/julian/pgppubkey.html>
