At 5:46 PM -0400 5/1/01, Scott McDermott wrote:
> One other question: is standalone mode a lot faster for serving with TLS
> encryption (presumably because it does session key init infrequently) ?
>
> We make heavy use of concurrency and rate limiting feature of xinetd, so
> standalone mode isn't an option, but perhaps an external session cache
> would be of help here...I might try implementing something like this if
> it's a lot faster, since our mail server doesn't have the most
> horsepower in the world :)
Qpopper 4 doesn't take advantage of several performance
improvements that could be done in standalone mode, such as doing a
lot of the initialization only once, and using a session cache.
Feel free to add this :-).
