On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 08:30:41AM -0500, Michael Smith wrote:
> I just ran across this problem yesterday with an outlook customer
> as well.  Somewhere between 3.x and 4.x some logic changed 
> somewhere that is now behaving in a very broken manner, IMO.
 
  This has been discussed pretty recently; I just sent in a patch too.

> Now, I'm not sure what the intended behavior is.  Should it
> a) return the too few arguments error? or

  I'm fairly sure that clients previously relied on it returning some
error, I believe the too few arguments error.

> b) check the blank password against the users password and
>    return an incorrect password error?
> 
> 
> I'm not sure which would be the correct behavior.  I know how to
> implement a) very easily.  Haven't figured out b) yet.  If qualcomm would
> be so kind as to tell us which behavior is correct, I'll see about
> whipping up a patch.

-- 
 Clifton Royston  --  LavaNet Systems Architect --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   WWJD?   "JWRTFM!" - Scott Dorsey (kludge)   "JWG" - Eddie Aikau

Reply via email to