On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 08:30:41AM -0500, Michael Smith wrote:
> I just ran across this problem yesterday with an outlook customer
> as well. Somewhere between 3.x and 4.x some logic changed
> somewhere that is now behaving in a very broken manner, IMO.
This has been discussed pretty recently; I just sent in a patch too.
> Now, I'm not sure what the intended behavior is. Should it
> a) return the too few arguments error? or
I'm fairly sure that clients previously relied on it returning some
error, I believe the too few arguments error.
> b) check the blank password against the users password and
> return an incorrect password error?
>
>
> I'm not sure which would be the correct behavior. I know how to
> implement a) very easily. Haven't figured out b) yet. If qualcomm would
> be so kind as to tell us which behavior is correct, I'll see about
> whipping up a patch.
--
Clifton Royston -- LavaNet Systems Architect -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWJD? "JWRTFM!" - Scott Dorsey (kludge) "JWG" - Eddie Aikau