:) ok, i'm now confused again *waits for you to slap him upside the
head*
ok, i do have hashed spools and a different temp dir location, so then
it's safe for me to enable this option?
-Tony
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services
"Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today"
http://www.asteroid-b612.org http://www.intergrafix.net
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Randall Gellens wrote:
> At 10:29 AM -0400 6/12/01, Admin Mailing Lists wrote:
>
> > i think i see..the old location being important IF, in a previous compiled
> > popper, the temp dir equaled the spool dir.
> > but if you have had a seperate temp directory for a while now, you can
> > safely set the --disable-old-spool-loc option
>
> Actually, I was too broad in my explanation. It only matters if you
> use hashed spool or home-directory. Simply changing the temp
> location doesn't matter.
>
