Yes, I didn't set up Qpopper suitable.
I was thinking, that the alternate-port option will be sufficing,
so that I don't have to define that port explicit.
Maybe it would be helpful to rename this option to make clear that
"alternate-port" and "stls" differ from the used protocol and not from the port,
even if the "alternate-port"-protocol mostly will be used on port 995.
Many thanks for your help !
regards
oliver
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> See page 42 in the PDF file, which explains how to start Qpopper in
> standalone mode. Step 2 shows how to specify the IP address and port
> number.
Randall Gellens wrote:
> Most likely you aren't setting things up so that Qpopper actually
> serves both ports. You do that using whichever method you normally
> use to cause Qpopper to service a port. This might be inetd, xinetd,
> or if you use standalone mode, an rc file. Whichever method you use,
> you'll need two instances of Qpopper, one per port.
