Hi, I am new to this newslisting. I have received this exact email from you at least 50 times in the last several days. I'm wondering if you would look to see if you could remove it from your queue files. Thank you very much,
Robin Wells-Meisner Sr. Systems Analyst Cleveland Clinic [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Saxon Jones wrote: > There are, in fact, different lock methods between our QPOPPER3 > (.username.pop) and QPOPPER4 (/Mail/db/pop-lockedout) setups. But the > corruption happened most noticeably when all users were using QPOPPER4. > Since we don't have a whole lot of web mail users, we didn't notice it in > our initial tests when we had only web mail users using QPOPPER4, and > regulars on QPOPPER3. > > ________________________ > Saxon Jones > > Network Administrator, > Interbaun Communications > Suite 200, 18404 Stony Plain Road > Edmonton, AB > T5S 2M8 > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.interbaun.com/ > (780) 447-8282, ext. 369 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Randall Gellens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 4:07 PM > To: Saxon Jones; QPopper Mailing List > Subject: RE: QPOPPER3 and QPOPPER4 > > At 3:45 PM -0600 10/15/01, Saxon Jones wrote: > >The mailbox corruption was happening when we run > >our web mail service on QPOPPER4, our regular mail users weren't having a > >problem. Right now we've moved our web mail back to QPOPPER3 and so I > don't > >expect to be able to get any debug info in the near future. > > I don't see why you'd get corruption using Qpopper version 4 but not > 3 as long as the web mail service is using POP (or even i it's going > at the spools directly). Could there be other differences, such as > different lock methods? > -- >
