On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 08:13:53AM -0700, Chuck Yerkes wrote: > Given the lack of information, I'd say that you > called it on the command line without the standalone > flags and it spewed this back at you. > > or > > And you did WHAT to get that error? > (cmon, you know how this works). > > Quoting The Doctor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:59:27PM -0700, Chuck Yerkes wrote: > > > It sounds like you're not invoking it from inetd > > > or from the command line without the standalone flags. > > > > > > More information will get you better answers. > > > > > > Quoting The Doctor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 05:03:38PM -0700, Randall Gellens wrote: > > > > Here is the error message I have been getting SINCE 4.0.4fc1. > > > > This is a non-issue in 4.0.3 > > > > Apr 13 09:53:23 doctor /usr/sbin/popper[9697]: Unable to obtain socket and >address > > > > of client: Socket operation on non-socket (38) > > > > Here is may configuration file: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --infodir=/usr/share/info >--mandir=/usr/share/man --with-low-memory --with-newlib --enable-servermode >--enable-shy --enable-poppassd --enable-log-login --with-openssl=/usr/contrib
/usr/sbin/popper 110 /usr/sbin/popper 995 -f /etc/mail/qpop/config.tls is what I typed. -- Member - Liberal International On 11 Sept 2001 the WORLD was violated. This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Society MUST be saved! Extremists must dissolve. Beware of defining as intelligent only those who share your opinions
