Does anybody have an open-source alternative? I hate to say this on the qpopper list, but I'm not terribly impressed with the software. I know it's freeware, but it's supported by a rather large commercial company, and you'd think they could give the community some indication as to what works and doesn't work - it's not like we're using weird hardware/software configurations!
Is there another POP3 server that may be more reliable and secure? And doesn't have 1+MB footprint ta boot? Are there alternative encryption configurations I can run with qpopper that will give my clients secure e-mail? I am appalled that I might have to bust out some low-level trace debugger to find out if I can run freakin secure POP3 connections! At 05:16 PM 9/9/02 -0400, Gary Schrock wrote: >At 03:55 PM 9/9/2002 -0500, you wrote: >OS: > >>FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE (P4 1.5ghz 1MB ram intel motherboard) >> >> >>I still can't get anyone to even acknowledge this works... that qpopper >>actualy does support SSL with any of the recent OpenSSL libraries... > >For the record, I updated my server to the latest stable release of >freebsd recently (say, a week or two ago from a version that probably >predated 4.5-release), and the previously working ssl on my qpopper >stopped working. (Seemed to start the connect, and then get killed, with >the message being logged about possible probing of the account). Eudora >would provide no indication of any error in this case. (In fact, until I >realized I wasn't getting my usual flood of mail, I didn't realize it >wasn't working). > >So personally, I think something along the lines of freebsd updating >openssl kills qpopper's ssl support. No idea what though. > > >Gary Schrock >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
