On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Brian C Hill wrote: > I know this is a little off-topic, and I know there is > has been some discussion touching on it. > > Which IMAP serever does everyone like? > > It sees that the one that comes with pine is fine according to > most. Is there a better one?
The UW imapd (the one that "comes with Pine") works well, it's free, and is very popular. My main objection is that it (actually IMAP in general, not just the UW imapd)) uses much more processor time per user than qpopper (or POP3 in general). That may be an issue on a heavily-loaded mail server. -- Chip Old (Francis E. Old) E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, BCPL Network Services Phone: 410-887-6180 Manager, BCPL.NET Internet Services FAX: 410-887-2091 320 York Road Towson, MD 21204 USA
