--On Wednesday, March 12, 2003 8:16 AM -0500 Daniel Senie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tempnam is POTENTIALLY dangerous if it isn't used correctly. In this > case, the usage is fine. The warning from the compiler is overbroad. Perhaps the build rule for that file can echo an "ignore following warning" message to deal with this FAQ. Unless there's some #pragma that can suppress that warning with suitable comments to explain why it's being used.
